No, they're not paramedics, but they are there to not only uphold the law but to obey it as well. And I thought it was against the law to beat someone half to death, then leave them to die.
I had a feeling you wouldn't find fault in the officers involved, I wonder why???
I was just wondering how they'd book him in while he was unconscious on the floor. Do they not need to get details from him? How are they supposed to get these details if they've beaten him to death?
And don't try to tell me they never laid a finger on him. If they hadn't they would be willing to answer all the questions the IPCC had, not refusing to answer ALL their questions.
It used to be a form of defence for someone accused of a crime to refuse to answer questions, no comment was the reply. Nowadays this is seen as an admission of some degree of guilt. Why was it not taken into consideration with regard to these now conveniently retired officers? |