The concept that the issue of climate change is part of the New World Order is not without its limitations. If the UK and the US are going to lead the NWO then it must be asked why they are split on the notion of climate change. It seems that the UK is willing to accept that climate change must be addressed, whereas the US stance is that they are not willing to participate especially when they refuse to accept the Kyoto Treaty.
However, more likely is the idea that perhaps climate change is for real except that some of its effects have been exaggerated in order to enhance arguments in favour of further legislation to introduce more controls in society (such as ‘Green Taxes’) and thus take away your liberties (forced rationalisation of Carbon through the use of ‘carbon-credit cards’). This could account for why the US appear to be gradually rethinking its policies on the environment. Another point to make is that climate change is a good topic for debate in order to avert attention from globalisation and its discontents, namely the New World Order.
__________________  |