On fist viewing it seAms that the argument is valid, that is the argument of which causes more deaths.
On the other hand there is the argument of age restrictions and funding of the "habit"
The current ABC system is for illegal drugs as far as i know so i will ask the old question of, are the government going to consider Tabacco and alcohol as illegal drugs?
Another absudity of the argument comes from the last paragraph of the link i will post...
Quote:
|
"[Our system] would be easy to use on a rolling basis, to reassess the harms of drugs as evidence developed," he said.
|
If "they" are so sure about their findings why do these clever c**** need a rolling basis? I think it is to move the goal posts when they are found to be wrong
link