Beyond Doubt - Page 2

Sweetpea · 02-04-2007, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinny

Did you think that or did some one point it out to you?

It's plain logic

skinny · 02-04-2007, 07:47 PM

Before or after the fact, which is or was my whole point??

Think about your comment?

Bruv · 02-05-2007, 12:50 AM

Who are you listening to Wolfie ?
Who could convince you ?

bugsy · 02-05-2007, 10:56 AM

Has anyone thought about this beyond their noses?

Meterologists are currently debating this and have come to the conlusion, that as far as records show, even using ice dating methods, that global warming is nothing new.Its come and gone from day dot.

Perhaps we are now in another warming cycle.
To blame humans for this is plain stupid.

Afer all, CAN MOTHER NATURE NOT LOOK AFTER HERSELF ?

Sid · 02-05-2007, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Courtney

I remain sceptical about humans causing global warming, due to the fact that there's no evidence whatsoever to say that humans are causing it.
I challange you to show me evidence (not scientists saying it's happening, actual evidence).

How the hell can you get 'actual' evidence?

Here's some evidence collected by those dodgy scientist people using different methods.

Global Warming

What you need to do is look at all the evidence available and make a decision.

Now can you find me some 'evidence' by anyone, except the local meths-swilling park dweller, that says there isn't any global warming and we'll way up the two and come to a conclusion?

bugsy · 02-06-2007, 11:09 PM

Its a matter of who do we believe....this government which lies from one day to another, this government who have billions..no trillions to make out of this scenario, this government who is run under the control of the new world order, this government who meddles in the occult, this government scientists who are in cahoots with other major power scientists?

Common guys......its'll blow over just as the foot and mouth, birdflu, and the other host of life ending scenarios

Bruv · 02-07-2007, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Common guys......its'll blow over just as the foot and mouth, birdflu, and the other host of life ending scenarios

Common ? Im not common....far from it.
Blow over ? Like the NWO scenario ?

You say some amazing things bugsy....you really do.

All the evidence points to the fact that Global warming is happening.
They HAVE taken into account the periodic warming that occurrs naturally, but they have also factored in the affect mans involvement might change things.
They run these projections on the upper and lower possibilties.....even the best is NOT good.
If Sir David Attenborough agrees.....its good enough for me

bugsy · 02-07-2007, 10:15 AM

The NWO is here to stay I,m afraid.....but on the global warming saga.....ha ha ha Sir David and his government backed documentaries.
what evidence Bruv? If this government told me that the sky was blue, I would go outside and check it out, for myself

Bruv · 02-07-2007, 05:35 PM

The sky is not blue.

Who do you trust bugsy ?
Internet conspiracy mongers ?

**Casper** · 02-09-2007, 10:05 AM

The concept that the issue of climate change is part of the New World Order is not without its limitations. If the UK and the US are going to lead the NWO then it must be asked why they are split on the notion of climate change. It seems that the UK is willing to accept that climate change must be addressed, whereas the US stance is that they are not willing to participate especially when they refuse to accept the Kyoto Treaty.

However, more likely is the idea that perhaps climate change is for real except that some of its effects have been exaggerated in order to enhance arguments in favour of further legislation to introduce more controls in society (such as ‘Green Taxes’) and thus take away your liberties (forced rationalisation of Carbon through the use of ‘carbon-credit cards’). This could account for why the US appear to be gradually rethinking its policies on the environment. Another point to make is that climate change is a good topic for debate in order to avert attention from globalisation and its discontents, namely the New World Order.