Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 'Diversity' means chasing down Whites

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017

    Default 'Diversity' means chasing down Whites


    Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Sid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006


    There's a simple point you've missed out here. White Europeans have been marauding across the globe taking what isn't theirs, including whole countries, for years.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018


    Though Britons are a race (and DNA testing shows we're one of the most genetically homogenous races in the world - comparable to the Japanese or the Basques - and certainly one of the most ancient, the Ŕngles and Saxons were only ever a minority elite) at this juncture I'm rather more concerned about our culture. Which is a benign and productive culture.

    How can you compare so-called white Roma Romanians with Asian Hindus? Or indeed Sikhs? Which would you rather live next to? Or believe contribute more to this country?

    And how do you think this country would have fared if the Scots had been dominant? With their lack of Common Law, lack of individual sovereignty, their clannish tribalism and their tolerance of rigid hierarchies? It's not like we have to imagine, we know what happens. Charles I, James II and the scottish-domimated Blair cabinet nearly destroyed this country. Blair himself is a Scot.

    Peoples whose culture has taught them to get on with other people and look for authority to a benign higher power are comparitively simple to get on with. Which includes West Indians with a Christian heritage. Despite the crime statistics.

    More important than that, is the sheer numbers. Everything is tolerable in small amounts. The problem is not blacks. The problem is the metropolitan socialist middle-class elites who hate Britian and England more so, and who have developed this immoral, Godless fantasy that the future is a borderless world, a world government where everything can be solved if only sensible people like them told us what do, we live in a melting pot hell and they get to keep their mansions in the country.

    The only answer for Britain is to infiltrate the two main parties and speak up for tradition, the individual, local democracy and borders. And until then stop believing the 'vote for this lot because it'll keep the other lot out' myth. They're both the same.
    Last edited by Cacadores; 01-01-2018 at 03:45 AM.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts