Whores & society. - Page 2

sybylyfyrysms · 04-17-2006, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sid

Isn't the silence from the two girls deafening.

ummm....not sure what's left to say.

Sid · 04-17-2006, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sybylyfyrysms

ummm....not sure what's left to say.

That's what I'd say as well, magic in prostitution for Christ's sake!!

sybylyfyrysms · 04-17-2006, 01:34 AM

again there's that blanket dismissiveness of anything that doesn't fit your blinkered world experince. it's such a turn off.

Blackgrass · 04-17-2006, 11:23 AM

I will be back never worry with some answers & questions after easter...busy at the moment.

**Casper** · 04-17-2006, 05:03 PM

Blackgrass goes red for now.

Would anyone else here not mind if their daughter became a prostitute?

Sid · 04-17-2006, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sybylyfyrysms

again there's that blanket dismissiveness of anything that doesn't fit your blinkered world experince. it's such a turn off.

Blinkered world experience, how would you know? You don't know me or anything about me.
Just because I disagree with you, you toss your toys out of the pram, that shows world experience does it?

I'll try this one again. In one of your posts one paragraph said that Prostitution was classed as a high art (by those who know?) then you say, in the same paragraph, men have clubbed women into contemptible submissiveness, and then show your true thoughts about men with a reference to petty erections.
Does that not sound like contradiction to you?

sybylyfyrysms · 04-18-2006, 07:52 PM

i disagree sid. i have some knowledge and experince of you, based upon your interaction here.

here's some observations:
*you dismiss many-faceted offerings as “total crap” and “stupendously stupid”;
*you sweepingly refer to (all) prostitutes as “dirty, desperate, drug-addled low-lifes” (well maybe the ones you can afford are);
*you spin and attach your own terms (like “knight in shining armour”, “crusade”, “noble profession”) to others' posts and then refute these terms that only you have uttered (so you seem to be arguing with yourself alone);
*likewise you tell me I am “ridiculous” for “consider[ing] a lawyer in the same light as a £20 a time whore". i didn't mention lawyers. (have you seen a doctor about these voices in your head?) but yes, there are low-life and high-life lawyers and prostitutes. and a whole spectrum in between.

so i do feel at liberty to form some picture of you (“After all, what's this board here for if not to express your views and be criticised for them?”).

there is no contradiction in my two statements. they are mutually exclusive and independent. prostitution has been openly revered and respected by certain civilisations and cultures in history (you do the homework); there are today many powerful men and women in business, politics, secret societies etc who respectfully employ prostitutes, (male and female). how does this contradict the general history of subordination of women in modern western culture?

(and i was being affectionate about the petty erections. they're soooo cute.)

Sid · 04-18-2006, 09:29 PM

[quote=sybylyfyrysms]

Quote:

here's some observations:
*you dismiss many-faceted offerings as “total crap” and “stupendously stupid”;

It is stupid to say that a whore is free in the sense she doesn't bind her sexuality to one man because she wouldn't make much money that way.

Quote:

*you sweepingly refer to (all) prostitutes as “dirty, desperate, drug-addled low-lifes” (well maybe the ones you can afford are);

I did, but then I revised the statement to most, which I hope you'll agree is a fact. And I've never used aprostitute, and never would, sex without love is petty and base.

Quote:

*you spin and attach your own terms (like “knight in shining armour”, “crusade”, “noble profession”) to others' posts and then refute these terms that only you have uttered (so you seem to be arguing with yourself alone);

That's the impression I got from the original post.

Quote:

*likewise you tell me I am “ridiculous” for “consider[ing] a lawyer in the same light as a £20 a time whore". i didn't mention lawyers.

No, but you tried to compare prostitution with any desk job a woman does, and then said they get metaphysically raped every day. A vast difference in jobs in my eyes. If you see them as the same that's up to you, but I'd certainly prefer to see my daughter doing any desk job rather than run the risk of getting a dodgy customer.

Quote:

(have you seen a doctor about these voices in your head?)

I don't have voices in my head, it's a little green bubble that appears then communicates telepathically.

Quote:

but yes, there are low-life and high-life lawyers and prostitutes. and a whole spectrum in between.

I'd rather she was a dodgy lawyer than a high-class pro.

Quote:

so i do feel at liberty to form some picture of you (“After all, what's this board here for if not to express your views and be criticised for them?”).

Feel free, at least I don't get annoyed when someone disagrees with me.

Quote:

there is no contradiction in my two statements. they are mutually exclusive and independent. prostitution has been openly revered and respected by certain civilisations and cultures in history (you do the homework); there are today many powerful men and women in business, politics, secret societies etc who respectfully employ prostitutes, (male and female). how does this contradict the general history of subordination of women in modern western culture?

Okay, okay, putting it that way I get your point.

Quote:

(and i was being affectionate about the petty erections. they're soooo cute.)

So you've been looking through my bedroom window, damn! I'd just had a cold shower, honest!

sybylyfyrysms · 04-19-2006, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casper

Would anyone else here not mind if their daughter became a prostitute?

i really believe i wouldn't mind Caspar. as long as she was enjoying and respecting herself.

**Casper** · 04-19-2006, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sybylyfyrysms

i really believe i wouldn't mind Caspar. as long as she was enjoying and respecting herself.

Sorry Syby, but I can't believe that.

I think deep down you really would mind, but of course you must side with Blackgrass now since you have had a fierce debate with Sid the Sexist.