Pie 'n' Mash Mark II - Page 4

White_Knight · 08-05-2008, 01:18 PM

So this is the "other site" that Sweetpea was going on about! Now I understand why she said to me "we have to watch what gets posted, as another site has got it in for us". Opps, looks like you can't censor me here SweetF**kAll!
In case you are wondering, I was banned because my opinions aren't right for SweetFA's vision of what the "Voice of Britain" should be. She is a seriously laughable person, with a huge inferiority complex. To be honest, anyone who spends all day on a cheap and tacky jewellery chat room, is bound to be a cheap and tacky person!

The Relic · 08-05-2008, 03:38 PM

Once she gained control of the other forum she, with the apparent assistance of her pet moderator, effectively trashed this one through childish attacks on other members when at a time when the owner, Will, was busy reviving it. Nice to know she's still paranoid about it - but then again, paranoia comes naturally to certain types, doesn't it? I hope she finds a big enough bunker to fit her head.

I still believe in this forum, which is a worthy venture run by a level-headed and moderate man, which is why I've started posting here again now that Streetpee and her bullies are gone. I have a feeling some of the old members, and some new ones like yourself, will begin rebuilding it.

poppy · 08-05-2008, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White_Knight

So this is the "other site" that Sweetpea was going on about! Now I understand why she said to me "we have to watch what gets posted, as another site has got it in for us". Opps, looks like you can't censor me here SweetF**kAll!
In case you are wondering, I was banned because my opinions aren't right for SweetFA's vision of what the "Voice of Britain" should be. She is a seriously laughable person, with a huge inferiority complex. To be honest, anyone who spends all day on a cheap and tacky jewellery chat room, is bound to be a cheap and tacky person!

I am sorry I do not wish to get embroiled in a silly argument, but if you post the obscene racist picturs of lynchings and spout your racist WS hate on here I am sure Will would moderate you too.
Sweetpea beet me to the delete button. Your thread was more suitable for storm front or other WS trash sites.
I was and still am happy to debate with you on any forum, but neither this site or the other specifies Talk White UK or Talk White Briton.
Racial hatred such as you were posting just isnt on.

White_Knight · 08-05-2008, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppy

I am sorry I do not wish to get embroiled in a silly argument,

Yet, here you are.

Quote:

but if you post the obscene racist picturs of lynchings

It was a picture of a dummy being hanged from the Daily mail, hardly racist, perhaps dummiest. Maybe that's what SweetFA found it so offencive. I believe all child killers should be hanged, hardly racist either.

Quote:

and spout your racist WS hate on here I am sure Will would moderate you too.

Perhaps he encourages debate from people who don't agree with his views, rather then just having a nice cosy little clique where only people who agree with the mighty ego of SweetFA and her cronies are allowed.

Quote:

Sweetpea beet me to the delete button. Your thread was more suitable for storm front or other WS trash sites.

Silly me, there was me thinking that SweetFA's forum was the "voice of Britain". It's since been made very clear that it's the voice of SweetFA, and her little flock of sheep. I guess some voices are more euqal then others eh?

Quote:

I was and still am happy to debate with you on any forum, but neither this site or the other specifies Talk White UK or Talk White Briton.
Racial hatred such as you were posting just isnt on.

No, your pitiful little site says "voice of Britain", I'm British and I voice my opinions. I think your site needs a disclaimer along the lines of "The Voice of Britain - Providing your voice fits with our agenda and ideals, if you do not think like we do, you will be banned". God forbid should your forum tackle anything as polorized as Multicultural Britain! In all honestly you're probably right, you'd better stick to nice fluffy subjects like the environment.

poppy · 08-05-2008, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White_Knight

Yet, here you are.

It was a picture of a dummy being hanged from the Daily mail, hardly racist, perhaps dummiest. Maybe that's what SweetFA found it so offencive. I believe all child killers should be hanged, hardly racist either.

Perhaps he encourages debate from people who don't agree with his views, rather then just having a nice cosy little clique where only people who agree with the mighty ego of SweetFA and her cronies are allowed.

Silly me, there was me thinking that SweetFA's forum was the "voice of Britain". It's since been made very clear that it's the voice of SweetFA, and her little flock of sheep. I guess some voices are more euqal then others eh?

No, your pitiful little site says "voice of Britain", I'm British and I voice my opinions. I think your site needs a disclaimer along the lines of "The Voice of Britain - Providing your voice fits with our agenda and ideals, if you do not think like we do, you will be banned". God forbid should your forum tackle anything as polorized as Multicultural Britain! In all honestly you're probably right, you'd better stick to nice fluffy subjects like the environment.

It is not my forum, I am happy to be a member there I was, before Sweetpea owned it andwas happy to stay that way after it changed hands. I myself have a completley opossing politcal stance to Sweetpea and we have clashed many times.
But that does not mean we dislike each other.
weather real or fake that picture was offencive and if I am not mistaken was removed from a thread on here when posted by someone else quite a while back.
But let us not argue other sites here, I said before I would be happy to debate with you. I noticed that you had joined here, so debate away.
It had gone a bit quiet and I did appear to be talking to myself, but I see folk are back so I am too.

**Will** · 08-07-2008, 05:01 PM

Oh dear, trouble in Paradise?

**Will** · 08-07-2008, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White_Knight

Perhaps he encourages debate from people who don't agree with his views, rather then just having a nice cosy little clique where only people who agree with the mighty ego of SweetFA and her cronies are allowed.

Bingo.

White_Knight · 08-07-2008, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppy

It is not my forum, I am happy to be a member there I was, before Sweetpea owned it andwas happy to stay that way after it changed hands. I myself have a completley opossing politcal stance to Sweetpea and we have clashed many times.
But that does not mean we dislike each other.
weather real or fake that picture was offencive and if I am not mistaken was removed from a thread on here when posted by someone else quite a while back.
But let us not argue other sites here, I said before I would be happy to debate with you. I noticed that you had joined here, so debate away.
It had gone a bit quiet and I did appear to be talking to myself, but I see folk are back so I am too.

That's funny, because you're just as guilty of selective censorship as your glorious leader. If you want a debate, lets start with why you like sweeping crime that involves black people under the carpet?

poppy · 08-07-2008, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White_Knight

That's funny, because you're just as guilty of selective censorship as your glorious leader. If you want a debate, lets start with why you like sweeping crime that involves black people under the carpet?

example please.

White_Knight · 08-07-2008, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Will

Oh dear, trouble in Paradise?

Not really, SweetFA is doing a wonderful job of banning or chasing off anyone who's opinions conflict with her own agenda.